New York City has one of the largest and most varied labor markets in the world. Our clients work in finance and banking, media and publishing, technology, healthcare, hospitality and restaurants, retail, construction, real estate, fashion, and the arts, for employers ranging from global banks and hospital systems to startups, nonprofits, and family businesses.
Some of the largest employers in New York City include Northwell Health, Mount Sinai Health System, NewYork-Presbyterian, the Metropolitan Transportation Authority, the City of New York, JPMorgan Chase, Citigroup, New York University, and Columbia University. When those employers cross the line, employees have real and enforceable rights.
Confidential settlement for violations of the NYCHRL's sexual harassment law, sex assault, and intentional infliction of emotional distress.
Settlement achieved in a high profile New York City sex assault case, pursuant to New York City's GMVA statute.
Confidential settlement reached pursuant to New York City's GMVA look-back window statute.
Recovered against a large scale life insurance company for racial discrimination, retaliation, and breach of contract.
Obtained against a large New York City hedge fund for claims of sexual harassment violations.
Over the past 12 months our Firm has obtained in excess of $20 million in settlements across high-stakes matters.
Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Every matter is different and depends on its own facts.
Employment law covers the rules that govern how a workplace treats the people in it, including discrimination, harassment, retaliation, and wrongful termination. Employees in New York City are protected by three overlapping layers of law: federal statutes, the New York State Human Rights Law, and the New York City Human Rights Law. That third layer matters enormously, because the NYCHRL is among the broadest anti-discrimination laws anywhere in the country and is required by its own terms to be construed liberally in favor of the people it protects.
Our Firm handles high-stakes, high-exposure employment matters in New York and is prepared to take a case through trial and verdict when that serves our client's interests.
The NYCHRL reaches considerably further than federal law. In New York City, it is unlawful for an employer to discriminate on the basis of:
Several of these categories, including caregiver status, credit history, and prior conviction record, have no equivalent under federal law.
Discrimination occurs when an employer treats a worker less favorably because of a protected characteristic rather than because of performance or business need. Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 prohibits discrimination based on race, color, religion, sex, and national origin, and the New York State and City Human Rights Laws cover a broader range of characteristics and, in the City's case, apply to employers of any size.
Discrimination is rarely announced. It usually appears as a pattern: exclusion from meetings or opportunities, a performance review that changes tone after a disclosure, a reorganization that removes one group, or a standard applied to one employee and not to others. Building that pattern into admissible evidence is the core of these cases.
Sexual harassment includes unwelcome sexual advances, requests for sexual favors, and other verbal or physical conduct of a sexual nature. It generally takes two forms. Quid pro quo harassment occurs when a job benefit is conditioned on submitting to sexual conduct. A hostile work environment arises when conduct is severe or pervasive enough to alter the conditions of employment.
New York has moved well beyond the federal standard. Under amendments to the New York State Human Rights Law, harassment is unlawful when it rises above petty slights and trivial inconveniences, and an employee no longer needs to identify a comparator to prove the claim. The NYCHRL applies a similarly protective standard, and neither law requires the employer to be of a particular size.
A single act of sexual assault at work is generally severe enough to create a hostile work environment as a matter of law. Survivors in New York City may also have a claim under the Gender Motivated Violence Act, which provides a civil remedy for crimes of violence motivated by gender and which opened a look-back window allowing certain previously time-barred claims to be brought.
Our Firm has recovered multi-million dollar settlements under the GMVA and the NYCHRL in high profile New York matters. These cases are handled with discretion and with attention to the survivor's privacy at every stage.
Title VII, Section 1981 of the Civil Rights Act of 1866, and the New York State and City Human Rights Laws all prohibit discrimination based on race and color. In practice this means an employer may not use race as a factor in hiring, pay, assignments, promotion, discipline, or termination.
New York City law also protects against discrimination based on natural hair texture and protective hairstyles, an issue the City's Commission on Human Rights has addressed directly in guidance to employers.
Employers may not treat workers less favorably because of sex or gender. This covers unequal pay, denial of assignments and promotions, and gender based harassment. New York State and City law expressly protect gender identity and gender expression, and New York's pay equity provisions restrict the ability of employers to justify pay disparities between employees performing substantially similar work.
Discrimination based on sexual orientation or gender identity is unlawful under federal law following the Supreme Court's decision in Bostock v. Clayton County, and it has been expressly prohibited under New York City and New York State law for longer. Protections extend to misgendering, refusal to use a chosen name, and denial of access to facilities consistent with an employee's gender identity.
New York law requires employers to provide reasonable accommodations for pregnancy, childbirth, and related medical conditions, and the federal Pregnant Workers Fairness Act now imposes a comparable obligation nationwide. Accommodations can include schedule adjustments, seating, additional breaks, or temporary changes to duties.
Refusing an accommodation, demoting an employee after she discloses a pregnancy, or terminating her before or after leave may all give rise to a claim.
The New York City Human Rights Law protects employees who provide direct and ongoing care for a child or a covered relative. This protection has no federal equivalent. An employer that penalizes a worker for caregiving responsibilities, or that assumes a caregiver is less committed and acts on that assumption, may be violating City law.
Under the Americans with Disabilities Act and New York law, an employer must provide reasonable accommodations to a qualified employee with a disability unless doing so would impose an undue hardship. New York City's definition of disability is notably broader than the federal one, and the City requires employers to engage in a cooperative dialogue with the employee about accommodation.
Failing to engage in that dialogue is itself a violation of the NYCHRL, separate from any failure to provide the accommodation.
The federal Age Discrimination in Employment Act protects workers aged 40 and over. New York State and City law go further and prohibit age discrimination without that threshold. Age claims often surface during restructurings, when experienced and higher-paid employees are disproportionately selected for elimination, or when a role is filled by a significantly younger hire shortly after a termination.
Employers must reasonably accommodate an employee's sincerely held religious beliefs and practices, including scheduling around observances and permitting religious dress and grooming, unless the accommodation would create an undue hardship. The Supreme Court's decision in Groff v. DeJoy raised the burden an employer must meet to refuse a religious accommodation.
Discrimination based on national origin, ancestry, accent, or perceived immigration status is unlawful. The New York City Human Rights Law expressly covers alienage and citizenship status, and City guidance treats threats to report an employee to immigration authorities as a form of unlawful discrimination and retaliation.
New York provides unusually strong protection here. Article 23-A of the New York Correction Law limits when an employer may deny employment based on a conviction, requiring an individualized assessment of specific factors rather than a blanket exclusion. New York City's Fair Chance Act goes further and generally prohibits employers from asking about criminal history until after a conditional offer has been made.
A hostile work environment exists when unwelcome conduct tied to a protected characteristic becomes a condition of continued employment. Under New York State and City law the threshold is lower than the federal severe or pervasive test, and conduct that a court might once have dismissed as isolated may now support a claim.
It is unlawful to punish an employee for reporting discrimination, participating in an investigation, requesting an accommodation, or opposing conduct they reasonably believe is illegal. Retaliation can take the form of termination, demotion, schedule changes, exclusion, or a sudden shift in performance reviews.
Retaliation claims are frequently stronger than the underlying complaint, because the timing and the change in treatment are often documented even when the original discrimination is not. An employee can prevail on retaliation even if the underlying complaint does not succeed.
New York Labor Law Section 740 was substantially strengthened in 2022. It now protects employees who disclose activity they reasonably believe is unlawful or poses a substantial danger to public health or safety, and it no longer requires an actual violation to be proven. The protection extends to former employees and independent contractors, and the statute provides for a jury trial.
Our Firm has obtained substantial recoveries in whistleblower retaliation matters, including on behalf of groups of public employees.
Whistleblowers who report fraud against the government under the federal False Claims Act or the New York False Claims Act help protect public funds and may receive a share of the money recovered. New York's statute is broader than the federal version and notably reaches certain tax fraud. These cases are filed under seal and are procedurally demanding, which makes early and experienced counsel important.
New York is an at-will employment state, which means an employer may generally end the relationship for any reason or no reason. That rule has significant limits. A termination is unlawful if it is based on a protected characteristic, if it is retaliation for protected activity, if it breaches a contract or collective bargaining agreement, or if it violates a specific statutory protection.
We assist clients with prevailing wage violations, unpaid overtime, minimum wage compliance, unlawful deductions, and misclassification of employees as independent contractors, under both the New York Labor Law and the federal Fair Labor Standards Act. New York's wage laws provide for liquidated damages and attorney's fees, and the state's look-back period is longer than the federal one.
Employment claims are governed by strict filing deadlines that vary by forum and by the type of claim. Filing with an administrative agency, such as the EEOC, the New York State Division of Human Rights, or the New York City Commission on Human Rights, carries different time limits than filing directly in court, and electing one route can affect the availability of another.
Because these deadlines are unforgiving and the rules have changed in recent years, the safest step is to have the dates specific to your situation confirmed early. Call 212-516-1868 for a free and confidential review.
There is no single correct sequence, and the right approach depends on your circumstances, but a few steps consistently strengthen a case:
A resignation can complicate a claim, so it is worth understanding your position before you make that decision.
Every matter is evaluated by an experienced attorney. We assess the legal theories available across all three layers of law, identify the strongest forum, and advise candidly on what a claim is realistically worth and what it will require. Where a matter can be resolved through negotiation we pursue that efficiently, and where it cannot we prepare the case for trial from the outset.
One of our Firm's strengths is that we have represented both employers and employees. That dual perspective gives us practical insight into how the other side evaluates claims, assesses risk, and approaches resolution.

Protecting individuals from unwanted sexual advances, requests for sexual favors, and other harassment of a sexual nature in the workplace.
Explore →
Safeguarding employees who report illegal, unethical, or fraudulent activity within their organization from retaliation or adverse action.
Explore →
Advocating for individuals who have faced discrimination based on race, age, gender, or religion, ensuring fair and equal treatment at work.
Explore →
Defending the rights of pregnant individuals and those with disabilities against discrimination in hiring, promotion, and employment practices.
Explore →
Assisting clients with labor-related issues including prevailing wage violations, overtime pay disputes, and minimum wage compliance.
Explore →
Whistleblowers who report fraud under the False Claims Act help protect public funds and may receive a portion of recovered money.
Explore →Our Firm's mission is to achieve exceptional results for our clients through skilled, ethical advocacy and a commitment to excellence. Regardless of a case's size or complexity, we fight to protect our clients' rights through meticulous preparation, dedication, and strategic judgment.
We are prepared to take cases through trial and verdict when necessary, and that willingness shapes how matters are prepared from the first day and how they are valued by the other side.
About the Firm
Trusted by clients across New York and New Jersey
Our clients come to us at difficult moments in their working lives. The feedback below reflects how the Firm handles those matters: directly, discreetly, and with attention to the people involved. Reviews appear on Google and other public platforms.
Attorney John Zidziunas was expedient, informative and gave sound advice when handling a matter for my family. We appreciated his professionalism, accessibility, and attention to detail.
John is a fantastic lawyer and has worked on many business projects for me and my son. He always keeps kool under pressure and delivers top notch results for us.
I had an exceptional experience working with John. He was not only professional and knowledgeable but truly invested in my case. Throughout the process he kept me informed and reassured.
John handled my employment claim after I was terminated very late in my career. Despite the odds, he fought for me and did a great job that led to an excellent result.
What sets our New York practice apart when your livelihood is on the line.
Financial backing guaranteed on the contingency matters we accept.
Across high-stakes employment and sexual assault matters.
We prepare every case for trial and take it to verdict when that serves the client.
Our work has been covered by Vanity Fair, Law360, the New York Post, and Business Insider.
Having represented employers and employees, we know how the other side evaluates risk.
Three decades of employment litigation across New York and New Jersey.
Setting the standard in workplace justice. Our attorneys have been recognized for their work representing clients in discrimination, harassment, and workplace sexual assault matters, and the Firm's cases have been covered by national media. Meet our attorneys.
A single act of sexual assault at work is generally severe enough to create a hostile work environment as a matter of law. How these claims work under federal, New York, and New Jersey law.
Read +Careful documentation strengthens every workplace sexual assault case. What to preserve, how to preserve it, and the common mistakes that undermine otherwise strong claims.
Read +The New Jersey Law Against Discrimination is one of the most protective employment statutes in the country, and it reaches beyond federal law in important ways.
Read +Tell us what happened. We will listen, explain your options plainly, and let you know whether you have a claim. There is no cost and no obligation.
Complete the form and our New York team will be in touch promptly.
Your information is kept confidential and is never shared.